Discussion:
Navy to sideline 17 vessels due to manpower shortage, operating crews will be redistributed: report
(too old to reply)
useapen
2024-08-27 07:52:20 UTC
Permalink
The Navy will reportedly sideline 17 vessels due to a manpower shortage
that makes it difficult to properly crew and operate ships across the
fleet.

There just aren't enough Merchant Marines to keep all the ships going at
once, according to Rear Admiral (Ret.) Mark Montgomery, senior director of
the Center on Cyber and Technology Innovation for the Foundation for
Defense of Democracy, told Fox News Digital. Merchant Marines operate the
many support vessels needed to keep the Navy running.

"The problem, of course, is the ships are at sea, away from home port 12
months of the year," Montgomery said. "So you need two crews … we're
desperately short of the number of people."

"There’s a lack of experienced merchant mariners to crew the ships, and
this is really a clear danger to national security," Montgomery added.

MOVEMENT OF CARRIER STRIKE GROUP INTO MIDDLE EAST SENDS A ‘HUGE MESSAGE OF
DETERRENCE’: SABRINA SINGH

The Military Sealift Command drafted a plan to put 17 ships into "extended
maintenance," which would include a redistribution of crews to other
vessels across the Navy, the U.S. Naval Institute reported.

The ships include two replenishment ships, one fleet oiler, a dozen
Spearhead-class Expeditionary Fast Transports and two forward-deployed
Navy expeditionary sea bases – the USS Lewis Puller, based in Bahrain and
the USS Herschel "Woody" Williams, based in Souda Bay, Greece.

The effort is known as the "great reset" and is awaiting approval from
Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Lisa Franchetti. The change will reduce
Navy demands for officers by 700 mariners.

MEET THE AMERICAN WHO LAUNCHED MODERN SUBMARINES, JOHN PHILIP HOLLAND,
‘BRILLIANT’ SELF-TAUGHT ENGINEER

The U.S. military has suffered some recruiting problems over the past few
years, most notably in the Army, which had to cut its force by 24,000 –
roughly 5% of jobs – in 2024 to account for recruiting shortfalls. The
Army stressed that it is not asking current soldiers to leave but is
aiming to affect posts that have remained empty.

Montgomery stressed that the issue mostly affects Merchant Marines.

"The sailors tend to man our warships … the merchant mariners man
something that’s equally important, which is the logistics backbone of the
Navy – oilers, ammo ships, transports ships that move the Army and Marine
Corps across the water," Montgomery explained.

"Just like 90% of trade is done by ships and not aircrafts, the same thing
applies at sea: It’s too difficult, too expensive – it’s not sufficient to
move all that stuff by aircraft, so it’s moved by ships," he continued.

NAVY WARSHIP PRODUCTION HITS 25-YEAR LOW, FALLS BEHIND CHINA: REPORT

A support group will consist of one or two ships that will move either in
proximity or just behind a carrier group of over half a dozen ships, with
specific jobs depending on region. Montgomery highlighted an instance
around five years ago when the navy tried to deploy 60 ships but only
managed to get 25 to sea due to insufficient numbers of people – and the
age of the ships remains a concern.

"The average age of the ships in the reserve force is about 45 years old,"
Montgomery said. "Between 20 and 30 years is fine, because you don’t have
the same issues of modernization of weapon systems and big changes in
electrical power distribution … but 17 of the ships are over 50 years
old."

The Navy has a 30-year shipbuilding plan that will include the
decommissioning of 48 ships to occur over a four-year period that started
in 2022, according to Seapower magazine.

In the first year, the Navy retired 10 ships, and in 2023 the force
retired 11 more ships ranging from missile cruisers, dock landing ships
and ocean tugs.

The U.S. Navy did not respond to a Fox News Digital request for comment by
time of publication.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/navy-sideline-17-vessels-manpower-shortage-
operating-crews-redistributed-report
a425couple
2024-08-27 16:35:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by useapen
The Navy will reportedly sideline 17 vessels due to a manpower shortage
that makes it difficult to properly crew and operate ships across the
fleet.
If you want to get a good sense of how the Democratic nominee would
perform in the Oval Office, take a good look at the performance of the
administration in which she’s currently vice president.
Chris Ahlstrom
2024-08-27 16:55:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by a425couple
Post by useapen
The Navy will reportedly sideline 17 vessels due to a manpower shortage
that makes it difficult to properly crew and operate ships across the
fleet.
If you want to get a good sense of how the Democratic nominee would
perform in the Oval Office, take a good look at the performance of the
administration in which she’s currently vice president.
Indeed! We have a pretty robust economy, infrastructure money is flowing
into states like Kentucky, we had a bipartisan immigration bill (until Trump
ordered his Johnson to kill it), a lot of stuff getting done in the face an
obstructionist Republican Congress, the Ukraine/Russia and Hamas/Israel
conflict, support for ameliorating anthropogenic climate change....

Still a lot that's wrong, but Trump won't solve *any* of it. Rather than
exhibit amnesia, go back to Trump's term and see all the stupid decisions he
made with national and international implications. Those who do not remember
the past condemn us to repeat it.

Not going back to that crap.
--
Your analyst has you mixed up with another patient. Don't believe a
thing he tells you.
Skeeter
2024-08-27 23:23:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by a425couple
Post by useapen
The Navy will reportedly sideline 17 vessels due to a manpower shortage
that makes it difficult to properly crew and operate ships across the
fleet.
If you want to get a good sense of how the Democratic nominee would
perform in the Oval Office, take a good look at the performance of the
administration in which she?s currently vice president.
Indeed! We have a pretty robust economy, infrastructure money is flowing
into states like Kentucky, we had a bipartisan immigration bill (until Trump
ordered his Johnson to kill it), a lot of stuff getting done in the face an
obstructionist Republican Congress, the Ukraine/Russia and Hamas/Israel
conflict, support for ameliorating anthropogenic climate change....
Still a lot that's wrong, but Trump won't solve *any* of it. Rather than
exhibit amnesia, go back to Trump's term and see all the stupid decisions he
made with national and international implications. Those who do not remember
the past condemn us to repeat it.
Not going back to that crap.
and yet people are struggling to pay bills and buy grocery's. You are
distracted but the glitter.
Charlie Glock
2024-08-28 00:50:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by a425couple
Post by useapen
The Navy will reportedly sideline 17 vessels due to a manpower shortage
that makes it difficult to properly crew and operate ships across the
fleet.
If you want to get a good sense of how the Democratic nominee would
perform in the Oval Office, take a good look at the performance of the
administration in which she?s currently vice president.
Indeed! We have a pretty robust economy, infrastructure money is flowing
into states like Kentucky, we had a bipartisan immigration bill (until Trump
ordered his Johnson to kill it), a lot of stuff getting done in the face an
obstructionist Republican Congress, the Ukraine/Russia and Hamas/Israel
conflict, support for ameliorating anthropogenic climate change....
Still a lot that's wrong, but Trump won't solve *any* of it. Rather than
exhibit amnesia, go back to Trump's term and see all the stupid decisions he
made with national and international implications. Those who do not remember
the past condemn us to repeat it.
Not going back to that crap.
and yet people are struggling to pay bills and buy grocery's. You are
distracted but the glitter.
Build Back Better has been a failure.
Infrastructure Bill has been an even bigger failure.

- 8 charging stations in 3 years?
- 0 Internet connections in 3 years.
- The Inflation Reduction Act. That one has to be a joke.

Look it up.
--
Charlie Glock
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms"
- Thomas Jefferson 1776
186282@ud0s4.net
2024-08-28 02:26:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Charlie Glock
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by a425couple
Post by useapen
The Navy will reportedly sideline 17 vessels due to a manpower shortage
that makes it difficult to properly crew and operate ships across the
fleet.
If you want to get a good sense of how the Democratic nominee would
perform in the Oval Office, take a good look at the performance of the
administration in which she?s currently vice president.
Indeed! We have a pretty robust economy, infrastructure money is flowing
into states like Kentucky, we had a bipartisan immigration bill (until Trump
ordered his Johnson to kill it), a lot of stuff getting done in the face an
obstructionist Republican Congress, the Ukraine/Russia and Hamas/Israel
conflict, support for ameliorating anthropogenic climate change....
Still a lot that's wrong, but Trump won't solve *any* of it. Rather than
exhibit amnesia, go back to Trump's term and see all the stupid decisions he
made with national and international implications. Those who do not remember
the past condemn us to repeat it.
Not going back to that crap.
and yet people are struggling to pay bills and buy grocery's. You are
distracted but the glitter.
Build Back Better has been a failure.
Infrastructure Bill has been an even bigger failure.
- 8 charging stations in 3 years?
- 0 Internet connections in 3 years.
- The Inflation Reduction Act. That one has to be a joke.
What, the Inflation-Causation-Act ? PERFECT success !!!

And just wait until they start hyper-taxing all those
'rich' biz/retailers !!!

Look up the PRICE of those 8 charging stations too :-)

As for the Navy ... it's been a similar prob in the UK
as well. Few want to sign-up anymore. Not sure if it's
disloyalty/apatriotism or just apathy. When things go
relatively well for awhile everyone starts to think
they don't NEED a military. What, ME worry ?

And then, BOOM.

And they wonder how the enemy made so much progress
so quickly.

TODAY ... well ... IF we seriously leveraged our tech
then we would need far fewer humans in the mil. This
is esp true for Navy and AF. Drones - semi and fully
autonomous - are the weapons systems of the future.
Many ships carrying such may need almost NO humans
except to turn the odd wrench. Subs can be automated
as well - and a lot smaller/faster because they would
not have to keep humans alive. Smart fighter-drones
replace most AF/Navy pilots. Humans become naught
but button-pushers, oft far from the actual battle.

China, reportedly, is a bit further alone when it
comes to semi/auto attack drones. Authoritarian
govt plus more money ... their mil AI chips are a
gen better and they've no ethical worries about
'accidents' or robots slaughtering humans.

We'd BETTER DAMNED WELL catch up, like TOMORROW.

Eventually, a bit further along, even Army will be
affected ... 'terminators' take the point. Imagine
a hovering drone with 16 guns and computer system
that NEVER misses a shot - perfect trajectory calx.
A few of those and you could wipe out thousands
within minutes.

(I see a drone that kinda looks like the old trad
UFO, with 16 gun barrels all around the rim, one
like 50mm grenade launcher, central fan turbine.
The shape alone helps deflect incoming fire. It
just flits around quick, IDs humans and pre-
programmed assets, fires. Evasive - teach it
based on flies/mosquitoes)

Like it or not, this IS the mil future.
Automated slaughter & destruction. The
'AI' is already up to the job ...
pothead
2024-08-28 02:42:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Post by Charlie Glock
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by a425couple
Post by useapen
The Navy will reportedly sideline 17 vessels due to a manpower shortage
that makes it difficult to properly crew and operate ships across the
fleet.
If you want to get a good sense of how the Democratic nominee would
perform in the Oval Office, take a good look at the performance of the
administration in which she?s currently vice president.
Indeed! We have a pretty robust economy, infrastructure money is flowing
into states like Kentucky, we had a bipartisan immigration bill (until Trump
ordered his Johnson to kill it), a lot of stuff getting done in the face an
obstructionist Republican Congress, the Ukraine/Russia and Hamas/Israel
conflict, support for ameliorating anthropogenic climate change....
Still a lot that's wrong, but Trump won't solve *any* of it. Rather than
exhibit amnesia, go back to Trump's term and see all the stupid decisions he
made with national and international implications. Those who do not remember
the past condemn us to repeat it.
Not going back to that crap.
and yet people are struggling to pay bills and buy grocery's. You are
distracted but the glitter.
Build Back Better has been a failure.
Infrastructure Bill has been an even bigger failure.
- 8 charging stations in 3 years?
- 0 Internet connections in 3 years.
- The Inflation Reduction Act. That one has to be a joke.
What, the Inflation-Causation-Act ? PERFECT success !!!
And just wait until they start hyper-taxing all those
'rich' biz/retailers !!!
Look up the PRICE of those 8 charging stations too :-)
As for the Navy ... it's been a similar prob in the UK
as well. Few want to sign-up anymore. Not sure if it's
disloyalty/apatriotism or just apathy. When things go
relatively well for awhile everyone starts to think
they don't NEED a military. What, ME worry ?
And then, BOOM.
And they wonder how the enemy made so much progress
so quickly.
TODAY ... well ... IF we seriously leveraged our tech
then we would need far fewer humans in the mil. This
is esp true for Navy and AF. Drones - semi and fully
autonomous - are the weapons systems of the future.
Many ships carrying such may need almost NO humans
except to turn the odd wrench. Subs can be automated
as well - and a lot smaller/faster because they would
not have to keep humans alive. Smart fighter-drones
replace most AF/Navy pilots. Humans become naught
but button-pushers, oft far from the actual battle.
China, reportedly, is a bit further alone when it
comes to semi/auto attack drones. Authoritarian
govt plus more money ... their mil AI chips are a
gen better and they've no ethical worries about
'accidents' or robots slaughtering humans.
We'd BETTER DAMNED WELL catch up, like TOMORROW.
Eventually, a bit further along, even Army will be
affected ... 'terminators' take the point. Imagine
a hovering drone with 16 guns and computer system
that NEVER misses a shot - perfect trajectory calx.
A few of those and you could wipe out thousands
within minutes.
(I see a drone that kinda looks like the old trad
UFO, with 16 gun barrels all around the rim, one
like 50mm grenade launcher, central fan turbine.
The shape alone helps deflect incoming fire. It
just flits around quick, IDs humans and pre-
programmed assets, fires. Evasive - teach it
based on flies/mosquitoes)
Like it or not, this IS the mil future.
Automated slaughter & destruction. The
'AI' is already up to the job ...
Democrats hate the military.
Sure there are budget items that are a waste and need to be cut but basic military funding,
especially in these times, should be a priority.
Instead the democrats are paying trillions to take care of illegal migrants.
China focuses on building a strong, intelligent nation while the USA can't seem to figure out how
many sexes there are.
Xi has to be laughing his ass off.
And why not, everyone else who is an adversary of the USA is.
--
pothead
Kamala Harris Is A Marxist
Tampon Tim Walz Is A Radical Left Wing Nutjob
They Are A Match Made In Heaven
186282@ud0s4.net
2024-08-28 05:15:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by ***@ud0s4.net
Post by Charlie Glock
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by a425couple
Post by useapen
The Navy will reportedly sideline 17 vessels due to a manpower shortage
that makes it difficult to properly crew and operate ships across the
fleet.
If you want to get a good sense of how the Democratic nominee would
perform in the Oval Office, take a good look at the performance of the
administration in which she?s currently vice president.
Indeed! We have a pretty robust economy, infrastructure money is flowing
into states like Kentucky, we had a bipartisan immigration bill (until Trump
ordered his Johnson to kill it), a lot of stuff getting done in the face an
obstructionist Republican Congress, the Ukraine/Russia and Hamas/Israel
conflict, support for ameliorating anthropogenic climate change....
Still a lot that's wrong, but Trump won't solve *any* of it. Rather than
exhibit amnesia, go back to Trump's term and see all the stupid decisions he
made with national and international implications. Those who do not remember
the past condemn us to repeat it.
Not going back to that crap.
and yet people are struggling to pay bills and buy grocery's. You are
distracted but the glitter.
Build Back Better has been a failure.
Infrastructure Bill has been an even bigger failure.
- 8 charging stations in 3 years?
- 0 Internet connections in 3 years.
- The Inflation Reduction Act. That one has to be a joke.
What, the Inflation-Causation-Act ? PERFECT success !!!
And just wait until they start hyper-taxing all those
'rich' biz/retailers !!!
Look up the PRICE of those 8 charging stations too :-)
As for the Navy ... it's been a similar prob in the UK
as well. Few want to sign-up anymore. Not sure if it's
disloyalty/apatriotism or just apathy. When things go
relatively well for awhile everyone starts to think
they don't NEED a military. What, ME worry ?
And then, BOOM.
And they wonder how the enemy made so much progress
so quickly.
TODAY ... well ... IF we seriously leveraged our tech
then we would need far fewer humans in the mil. This
is esp true for Navy and AF. Drones - semi and fully
autonomous - are the weapons systems of the future.
Many ships carrying such may need almost NO humans
except to turn the odd wrench. Subs can be automated
as well - and a lot smaller/faster because they would
not have to keep humans alive. Smart fighter-drones
replace most AF/Navy pilots. Humans become naught
but button-pushers, oft far from the actual battle.
China, reportedly, is a bit further alone when it
comes to semi/auto attack drones. Authoritarian
govt plus more money ... their mil AI chips are a
gen better and they've no ethical worries about
'accidents' or robots slaughtering humans.
We'd BETTER DAMNED WELL catch up, like TOMORROW.
Eventually, a bit further along, even Army will be
affected ... 'terminators' take the point. Imagine
a hovering drone with 16 guns and computer system
that NEVER misses a shot - perfect trajectory calx.
A few of those and you could wipe out thousands
within minutes.
(I see a drone that kinda looks like the old trad
UFO, with 16 gun barrels all around the rim, one
like 50mm grenade launcher, central fan turbine.
The shape alone helps deflect incoming fire. It
just flits around quick, IDs humans and pre-
programmed assets, fires. Evasive - teach it
based on flies/mosquitoes)
Like it or not, this IS the mil future.
Automated slaughter & destruction. The
'AI' is already up to the job ...
Democrats hate the military.
Sure there are budget items that are a waste and need to be cut but basic military funding,
especially in these times, should be a priority.
Instead the democrats are paying trillions to take care of illegal migrants.
China focuses on building a strong, intelligent nation while the USA can't seem to figure out how
many sexes there are.
Xi has to be laughing his ass off.
And why not, everyone else who is an adversary of the USA is.
Yep - we (and much of Europe) have 'sophisticated' ourselves
to the brink of oblivion. Our "worst problems" have nothing
to do with Worst Problems.

I figure Xi gets the western half, Vlad gets the
eastern half - and Iran will have to get SOME
little bit too - hopefully some deep blue enclave
where there are lots of infidels to beat into
submission - that'll make 'em happy :-)

ANYway ... the mil future can NOT resemble mil past.
That just doesn't work. Look into the VAST quantities
of lives spent by old Brit officers in WW-1 using
19th-century troop/horse charges - on interlocking
German machinegun nests and howitzer batteries. TOOK
awhile for someone to realize that wasn't working.
By then we had the "lost generation".

I'm sure old US/UK officers WANT to hang on to the
old ways - vast squads of soldiers snapping to
attention everywhere they appear. SO grand, SO
satisfying to the ego.

But that's not how it will be - CAN be. From
now on it's "terminator" warfare, tech-vs-tech
with fewer and fewer humans involved. Ukraine
may be the last of the old wars - still lots of
humans fighting each other - but we've seen the
toll that has taken. It's unsustainable. The
drones, cruise missiles and glide bombs now do
the bulk of tactical damage. Ukraine made this
especially clear, thwarting the Russian invasion
with cheap-ass drones, doing HUGE damage on their
armor, supplies and troops. This is the new pattern.

Mil ? How about "Team Land-War", "Team Ocean-War"
and "Team Air-War" ... basically a bunch of govt
employed game geeks. The uniform is a Hawaiian
shirt and a bag of Cheetos. They'll work out of
basements across the USA - average age 14.
Gary Roselles
2024-08-28 05:19:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by pothead
Post by Charlie Glock
Post by Skeeter
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by a425couple
Post by useapen
The Navy will reportedly sideline 17 vessels due to a manpower shortage
that makes it difficult to properly crew and operate ships across the
fleet.
If you want to get a good sense of how the Democratic nominee would
perform in the Oval Office, take a good look at the performance of the
administration in which she?s currently vice president.
Indeed! We have a pretty robust economy, infrastructure money is flowing
into states like Kentucky, we had a bipartisan immigration bill (until Trump
ordered his Johnson to kill it), a lot of stuff getting done in the face an
obstructionist Republican Congress, the Ukraine/Russia and Hamas/Israel
conflict, support for ameliorating anthropogenic climate change....
Still a lot that's wrong, but Trump won't solve *any* of it. Rather than
exhibit amnesia, go back to Trump's term and see all the stupid decisions he
made with national and international implications.  Those who do not remember
the past condemn us to repeat it.
Not going back to that crap.
and yet people are struggling to pay bills and buy grocery's. You are
distracted but the glitter.
Build Back Better has been a failure.
Infrastructure Bill has been an even bigger failure.
- 8 charging stations in 3 years?
- 0 Internet connections in 3 years.
- The Inflation Reduction Act. That one has to be a joke.
    What, the Inflation-Causation-Act ? PERFECT success !!!
    And just wait until they start hyper-taxing all those
    'rich' biz/retailers !!!
    Look up the PRICE of those 8 charging stations too  :-)
    As for the Navy ... it's been a similar prob in the UK
    as well. Few want to sign-up anymore. Not sure if it's
    disloyalty/apatriotism or just apathy. When things go
    relatively well for awhile everyone starts to think
    they don't NEED a military. What, ME worry ?
    And then, BOOM.
    And they wonder how the enemy made so much progress
    so quickly.
    TODAY ... well ... IF we seriously leveraged our tech
    then we would need far fewer humans in the mil. This
    is esp true for Navy and AF. Drones - semi and fully
    autonomous - are the weapons systems of the future.
    Many ships carrying such may need almost NO humans
    except to turn the odd wrench. Subs can be automated
    as well - and a lot smaller/faster because they would
    not have to keep humans alive. Smart fighter-drones
    replace most AF/Navy pilots. Humans become naught
    but button-pushers, oft far from the actual battle.
    China, reportedly, is a bit further alone when it
    comes to semi/auto attack drones. Authoritarian
    govt plus more money ... their mil AI chips are a
    gen better and they've no ethical worries about
    'accidents' or robots slaughtering humans.
    We'd BETTER DAMNED WELL catch up, like TOMORROW.
    Eventually, a bit further along, even Army will be
    affected ... 'terminators' take the point. Imagine
    a hovering drone with 16 guns and computer system
    that NEVER misses a shot - perfect trajectory calx.
    A few of those and you could wipe out thousands
    within minutes.
    (I see a drone that kinda looks like the old trad
    UFO, with 16 gun barrels all around the rim, one
    like 50mm grenade launcher, central fan turbine.
    The shape alone helps deflect incoming fire. It
    just flits around quick, IDs humans and pre-
    programmed assets, fires. Evasive - teach it
    based on flies/mosquitoes)
    Like it or not, this IS the mil future.
    Automated slaughter & destruction. The
    'AI' is already up to the job ...
Democrats hate the military.
Sure there are budget items that are a waste and need to be cut but basic
military funding,
especially in these times, should be a priority.
Instead the democrats are paying trillions to take care of illegal migrants.
China focuses on building a strong, intelligent nation while the USA can't
seem to figure out how
many sexes there are.
Xi has to be laughing his ass off.
And why not, everyone else who is an adversary of the USA is.
  Yep - we (and much of Europe) have 'sophisticated' ourselves
  to the brink of oblivion. Our "worst problems" have nothing
  to do with Worst Problems.
  I figure Xi gets the western half, Vlad gets the
  eastern half - and Iran will have to get SOME
  little bit too
Shut the fuck up, you fucking pseudo-sage Nazi racist. You don't know a fucking
thing. You're an 80-year-old blowhard with congestive heart failure. Just shut
the fuck up now.
Siri Cruise
2024-08-28 19:03:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by pothead
Democrats hate the military.
And the Merchant Marine are not part of the military. They
frequently work for USN, but to do freight and personnel transport
whether for the government or private ship owners. They are not
used for combat.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
Siri Cruise
2024-08-28 18:59:54 UTC
Permalink
  As for the Navy ... it's been a similar prob in the UK
  as well. Few want to sign-up anymore. Not sure if it's
  disloyalty/apatriotism or just apathy. When things go
  relatively well for awhile everyone starts to think
  they don't NEED a military. What, ME worry ?
The Merchant Marine is not part of the Navy. The sailors are not
military or even government. I had an uncle in the Merchant Marine
in the last war. The ships can be government or private.

The way to bolster the Merchant Marine is entice more young adults
to be commercial sailors on freighters and such. The usual way is
to make it a lucrative career. More money.

In the 1940s commercial and military sailors often did the same
things with Merchant Marine paid much more than Navy. On the other
hand Navy sailors got additional benefits and backing from the
Department of the Navy. Merchant Marine were not sent into combat;
they only had to deal with hazards at sea; like torpedoes.
--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
Governor Swill
2024-08-28 09:49:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Charlie Glock
- 8 charging stations in 3 years?
- 0 Internet connections in 3 years.
- The Inflation Reduction Act. That one has to be a joke.
Get back to us in a few years when these projects near completion.

--
"Of all the things that I hated about my childhood, nothing
compared to the revolving door of father figures." -- JD Vance

#NEVERtrump
Chris Ahlstrom
2024-08-28 11:02:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Governor Swill
Post by Charlie Glock
- 8 charging stations in 3 years?
- 0 Internet connections in 3 years.
- The Inflation Reduction Act. That one has to be a joke.
Get back to us in a few years when these projects near completion.
Red states are already using IRA money to do things like repair roads and
bridges, built battery plants, ... And their legislators brag about the money
they got from the act against which they voted.
--
You will be successful in love.
Rudy Canoza
2024-08-28 14:40:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chris Ahlstrom
Post by Governor Swill
Post by Charlie Glock
- 8 charging stations in 3 years?
- 0 Internet connections in 3 years.
- The Inflation Reduction Act. That one has to be a joke.
Get back to us in a few years when these projects near completion.
Red states are already using IRA money to do things like repair roads and
bridges, built battery plants, ... And their legislators brag about the money
they got from the act against which they voted.
There is no hypocrisy quite like Republiscum/QAnon hypocrisy. I'm sure some
Democrats could be hypocritical in a similar way, but the *degree* of
Republiscum/QAnon hypocrisy is so staggering that it virtually becomes a
difference in kind and not just a difference in degree.
--
Every Republiscum/QAnon accusation is, in fact, a confession
Loading...